Third Method In Management Philosophy: Ahmet Yesevi And Spiritual Leadership


Abstract views: 92 / PDF downloads: 34

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10446735

Keywords:

Leadership, Spiritual Leadership, Management Philosophy, Divan-i Hikmet, Ahmet Yesevi

Abstract

The issue of spiritual leadership has been revealed by examining the studies done in the last thirty years. In other words, the concept of spiritual leadership was defined, and then the descriptive analysis of some parts that were thought to reveal the spiritual leadership aspect of Ahmet Yesevi in his book named Divan-ı Hikmet, respectively, at the systematic and conceptual level, were made according to the philosophy of management.

The main purpose of this study is to deal with the situation between the management philosophy formed under the influence of western culture and the management philosophy formed in the eastern culture with the leader-follower dimension and to try to compare the different points. For this reason, Ahmet Yesevi and his followers, who represent the management philosophy in eastern culture, constitute the focus of the study. For this reason, in the first part of the study, the concept of spiritual leadership, which has become popular in the West, is mentioned. Within the scope of the study, various esoteric structures were included while examining the eastern and western organizational culture. Thus, it is aimed to understand the subject in a broader framework. At the same time, for the method of the study; As a reference, his work called Divan-ı Hikmet, which is accepted by many historians as belonging to Yesevi, has been examined on the basis of its places related to the subject. From this point of view, descriptive analysis method was applied by using qualitative data analysis method. Ahmet Yesevi has revealed that the positivist and Platonist logic of the west is not sufficient on its own. He recommended the holistic (integrative) perspective to his followers, who see himself as a spiritual leader. He expressed the basic management philosophy necessary to achieve this as the balanced establishment of the relationship between reason, knowledge, love and virtue. While reason and knowledge express the outward (material) aspect of the person; love and virtue express the esoteric (spiritual) aspect of people.

References

Bass, Bernard M. - Avolio, Bruce J. “Transformational leadership and organizational culture”. The International journal of public administration 17/3-4 (1994), 541-554.

Battal, Fetullah - Durmuş, İbrahim. “Modern Ahilik Ölçeği Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”. Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 63 (2017), 71-84.

Cebecioğlu, Ethem. “Hoca Ahmet Yesevî”. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 34/1-4 (1993), 87-132.

Covey, S. R. “Principle-centered leadership, New York: Summit”. Creswell, JW (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods.

Farling, Myra L. vd. “Servant leadership: Setting the stage for empirical research”. Journal of leadership studies 6/1-2 (1999), 49-72.

Frager, Robert. Kalp, nefs ve ruh. Sufi Kitap, 2018.

Fry, Louis W. vd. “Spiritual leadership and army transformation: Theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline”. The leadership quarterly 16/5 (2005), 835-862.

Fry, Louis W. “Toward a theory of spiritual leadership”. The leadership quarterly 14/6 (2003), 693-727.

Fry, Louis W. - Nisiewicz, Melissa Sadler. Maximizing the triple bottom line through spiritual leadership. Stanford University Press, 2013.

Gülbeniz Akduman. “Ruhsal Liderlik”. 21. yüzyılda liderlik yaklaşımları, 105.

House, Robert J. - Shamir, Boas. “Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic, and visionary theories.”

Hökelekli, Hayati. “İslam geleneğinde psikoloji kültürü”. İslami Araştırmalar Dergisi 19/3 (2006), 409-421.

Kılıç, Rüya. “Ahmet Yaşar Ocak’ın Eserlerinde İslam Ve Kimlik Meselesi.” Hacettepe University Journal of Turkish Studies/HÜTAD Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi 19 (2013).

Kilic, Mahmud Erol. Tasavvufa giriş. Sufi Kitap, 2012.

Koçel, Tamer. İşletme yöneticiliği: yönetim ve organizasyon, organizasyonlarda davranış, klasik, modern, çağdaş ve güncel yaklaşımlar. Arıkan Basım Yayınları, 2007.

Kouzes, James M. - Posner, Barry Z. “Credibility. San Francisco: Jose Bass”. Inc. Publisher.

Köprülü, Mehmet Fuat - Köprülü, Orhan F. “Türk edebiyatı’nda ilk mutasavvıflar”. (No Title).

Kurnaz, Cemal. “Abdülkerim bin Şeyh Mûsâ Makâlât-ı Seyyid Hârûn”. İstanbul: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.

Moxley, Russ S. “Leadership and spirit: Breathing new vitality and energy into individuals and organizations”. (No Title).

Northouse, Peter G. Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications, 2021.

Okuyucu, Cihan. “Hazînî, Cevâhirü’l-ebrâr min emvâci’l-bihâr”. Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi Gevher Nesibe Tıp Tarihi Enstitüsü.

Özden, H. Ömer. “Yahya Kemal ve tasavvuf”. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 1/1 (2015), 97-123.

Özköse, Kadir. “Anadolu Erenlerinden Ahi Evran-I Veli”. Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, 2022.

Pfeffer, Jeffery. “Business and the spirit. Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance”. New York: ME Sharpe, 2003.

Rabbânî, İmâm-I. “Ariflerin Halleri”. Çev.: Necdet Tosun, İkinci Baskı, İstanbul: Sufi Kitap, 2010.

Şahin, Haşim. Osmanlı Devletinin Kuruluş Döneminde Abdalan-I Rum (1300-1400). Sakarya Universitesi (Turkey), PhD Thesis, 2001.

Varlı, Nazife. “Erken dönem İslâm âlimlerinin psikolojiye katkıları: akıl, nefs, ruh kavramları”. Antakiyat 2/1 (2019), 67-89.

Yılmaz, Mehmet Emin. “Budapeşte’deki Gül Baba Türbesi’nin Onarımları 1884-1915”. Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Velî Araştırma Dergisi 99 (2021), 11-36.

Zohar, Danah. Spiritual intelligence: The ultimate intelligence. Bloomsbury publishing, 2012.

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Battal, F. (2023). Third Method In Management Philosophy: Ahmet Yesevi And Spiritual Leadership. Turkish Management Review, 2(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10446735

Issue

Section

Reseach Articles